Wednesday, July 29, 2015

The wish to be a MOTHER

Saw an advt in the news papers this morning (July 30, 2015. Mumbai Mirror. Page 5). While the gist of the matter gave me heart, what bothered me were the specifications! We use such discretion while selecting marriage partners and now are doing so for progeny as well!  
Yes, being sure about what you get is good, but such classifications as “fair or wheatish complexion”! What is that for? Shouldn't the requirement be for a “strong, healthy, ailment free, living a good and clean lifestyle, intelligent donor?
It takes two sets of people for a baby to be born. What guarantee that the receiver is as fair or as wheatish as the donor? What if the receiver is dark and the chromosomes are dominant and therefore the foetus takes on the dominant characteristics? Will the resulting baby be disowned because he or she is dark?

Such advts make my blood boil.

Like I said before the fact that people are advertising openly for egg donors is a sign that now people are more aware, knowledgeable and are more willing to for in for IVF. They are no longer seeking ONLY divine intervention, Babaji ki dua or jadibuti ka chamatkar!   



I guess there is still a long way to go before we accept colour, creed and class. However, till we get there, let me rejoice in the fact that we have atleast woken up. HALLELUJAH! 

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Worse than an ANIMAL - He is condemned!!!


Mornings are more often than not spoiled after going through the morning news papers! Today morning was no different and yet I closed the paper with a sickening feeling in my heart. The headlines “SC to hear if Navy right in sacking staffer for incest” http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-to-hear-if-Navy-right-in-sacking-staffer-for-incest/articleshow/47919111.cms made me wonder. Are they ACTUALLY wasting time questioning the right of the Navy to sack this sicko or are they condemning the INCEST!!!!

The case in question is about the need for the Supreme Court to examine a critically sensitive issue wherein they want to check if a Navy officer can be dismissed from service for having consensual sexual relations with his daughter! What is it that I’m missing here? 
For me its a clear cut case of RAPE! Rape of a young girl, rape of trust, rape of faith, rape of the relationship that fathers and daughters share, rape of justice, rape of integrity, rape of dignity, rape of everything that glorifies fathers!

Why then is there a need to even get into any other argument?

The man is guilty in the sorrowful eyes of the girl, in the eyes of the Armed Forces Tribunal, in the eyes of the Navy, and most importantly in the eyes of GOD! There SHOULD be no need for appeal.

He has disrespected his role as a father, he has disrespected his daughter, he has disrespected the relationship, he has disrespected the sanctity of the father daughter bond, he has disrespected common sense and intelligence. He has no right to appeal.


He is condemned!!! MAY GOD NEVER SAVE HIM!!! AMEN!!!